I don't think there's anyone around here who is as obnoxious as that. Even when if it does seem inferred in some of the WoL detractors arguments, usually it is never actually intended.
As far as I can tell from the b.net forums, the only reason why someone would become borderline abusive is when someone rebuts and claims victory over a carefully reasoned critique with arguments that consist of either a wave-of-the-hand, constant refusal to acknowledge basic principles, taking a position of hard-core relativism or being contrarian with the flimsiest of pretenses. Who wouldn't be pissed off about that?





Reply With Quote


