This is a question I thought I'd ask.
It isn't about the technology, or the science. The technology would partake to why it's called a rifle, and what 'gauss' implies.
The science is electromagnetic conduction, as all of us nerds probably know.
My issue is that that is the above is the only science we're willing to look at - is there other science? We tend to view physics as something that gets in the way - many of the more mature among us will hand wave.
I do agree to hand waving and phlebotinum for fictional SCIENCE! from time to time - but, what does real science say about a gauss rifle?
Not the technology - not the science that we already know.
The physics? What does the trajectory physics say? Yeah, we all hate physics and how finicky it is for sci fi, I know, I know...
----
But - I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that anything in excess of mach 10 can make a surface liquify on impact. But because a body in motion tends to remain in motion though, the actual bullet doing the impact will not liquify with the surface.
The above fact I read about was regarding meteorites, which tend to move at hypervelocity (mach 10 and above). Meteorites can travel hundreds (thousands?) of kilometers in a trajectory through the atmosphere, where they appear as shooting stars. Their duration of travel is the instant in which you can see them as a fireball - far less than a second. So you can guess at how fast hypervelocity really is (roughly 20km per second).
But that's not the root of my question. My real question is - wouldn't any bullet fired by a gauss rifle burn up? And even if it didn't, wouldn't it cause the enemy extreme pain? Interestingly, the ideal point for soft targets to engage gauss rifle wielders is at 'medium range' - wear they avoid the overpressure wave (which would gruesomely explode bodies like a bunch of granadas) and the point where the bullet encounters enough air drift to turn itself into a fiery streak, capable of setting fire to anything in its way. This mid-way point would be a fairly brief window, though.
Maybe that's the only real damage the gauss rifle does? Sear its target? Or explode it with a lucky point blank shot? Set any soft target on fire (including zerglings, explaining why they chow down and why my theory that .50 cal HMG as the cheapest modern thing stopping them might hold)?
Anyway, if the answer is yes - then there's hard science fiction proof for why terran soft armor sucks. If gauss rifles are so easy to produce, why bother with bullets that can set you on fire and melt your expensive (catch anything) fabric?
Even with long advances in hard armor for vehicles - gauss rifles can still cause liquefaction with their very high firing rates (which is why I considered 1800rpm in my game from long ago).
----
Just some food for thought. Asimov style. >_>





Reply With Quote


