08-14-2009, 02:33 PM
#71
08-14-2009, 03:28 PM
#72
Yeah, I totally hate how I put thought, effort, logic and reason into my posts, rather than just stating opinion as fact without even the slightest hint of proof, evidence, logical consequence, or factual basis.Please do me a favor and update your sig with the following line: "Blah blah blah..."
And then once you've updated it, draw some wacky parallel to hamsters about why this line doesn't represent every argument of yours. And then dispute that argument in a followup thread with an analogy of how milk tastes better after eating chocolate.
The problem with being reasonable is that unreasonable people can just say, "That doesn't prove anything!" or "You're wrong!" without going through a fraction of the effort the reasonable person does. Being ignorant and having ignorant positions doesn't take anywhere near the effort of knowing things, but has just as much weight in an open discussion. How exactly is that fair?
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." - C. S. Lewis
"You simply cannot design a mechanic today to mimic the behaviour of a 10-year old mechanic that you removed because nearly nobody would like them today." - Norfindel, on the Macro Mechanics
"We want to focus the player on making interesting choices and not just a bunch of different klicks." - Dustin Browder
StarCraft 2 Beta Blog
08-14-2009, 03:31 PM
#73
08-14-2009, 03:38 PM
#74
I'm with you Nicole... it makes absolutely no sense how one person's ignroant opinions outweigh another person's informed opinions... I guess it's in the nature of an un-moderated debate since there isn't an audience to judge who's right or wrong. The ignorant will remain ignorant.
08-14-2009, 03:45 PM
#75
08-14-2009, 04:00 PM
#76
It's not facts, it's common sense. He had to use a chemistry model to show you because you don't seem to get it.
08-14-2009, 04:21 PM
#77
08-16-2009, 02:58 PM
#78
If anything, I think the whole spine crawler needs to be reworked...
It's attack looks really awkward
08-16-2009, 03:36 PM
#79
08-16-2009, 04:24 PM
#80
If they have the time and resources to address model fixes, then I don't see the problem with them tackling it.
For us we may think Carriers and Thors are higher priority, but the Zealot makes sense to be revamped. Take into consideration the amount of times you'd see zealots in a game compared to Carriers. Some games can be decided within the first 2 minutes with a simple rush. Making sure the early game units look the best is more important than later tier units.
Also, art is something that persists up until the last two weeks before the game ships. Just because the Zealot is being remodelled doesn't mean the Carrier and Thors won't. It's simply understanding the process and seeing the bigger picture, not breaking down every little thing Blizzard does and freaking out because they're not working on 'more important things'.