
Originally Posted by
TychusFindlay
That would depend on the meaning you attach to 'Amazing' and what component of the game you are focusing on. I voted 'Amazing' but that's because I mostly ignore the SP when rating it as I spend 10000x more time on the MP. The MP is 'Amazing' to me because it has completely taken me from SCBW (no small feat) and kept me playing daily since release. No other game had done that, except for other Blizzard games. Basically, it has met my lofty expectations which is an 'Amazing' accomplishment and, therefore, deserves an 'Amazing' vote.
I would rate the SP as 'good' because it was a blast to play but had a disappointing story. If I were to average them into a rating a la a review, it would be great, however, there was no great, only 'good' and then 'amazing'. Quite a large gap there. 'Amazing' summed up my opinion more thoroughly than 'good' did because 'good' by a rational standard would be keeping my interest for about twenty or so hours a year or a review rating of 7/10. That doesn't describe StarCraft 2 to me.
If only the world thought more like Spychi it would be such a bett-- No, wait, we'd go back into the dark ages due to the backwards ass legal laws those idiots would create. StarCraft 2 may not be perfect but its not trash and your game count shows you don't think so either. In fact, most of the complaints I've heard from you have more to do with the company that made it than the game itself. You're basically flaming us because we have separated Activision Blizzard and StarCraft 2 from our minds.
Oh well, you're weren't unanimiously dubbed the ferrous craneous for nothing so I'll save my fingers anymore use on you.