Food limit back to 300?

[sandwich_bird]

At first starcraft II food limit was at 300. Of course Blizzard changed that and returned to 200 but why? I don't see the problem with 300. Imo with the implementation of MBS we will see a lot more people hitting the 200 limit faster. Also, unlimited selection is a nice tool for maneuvering larger armies.

What do you guys think? Should they return to 300, stick with 200 or chose another number?

[Crazy_Jonny]

Honestly, both should be an option. But at default, it should be 200.

[Kimera757]

When has it ever been 300? It was 200 from the get-go.

In Warcraft III, you can change the food limit. People need to learn how to use that editor.

[Crazy_Jonny]

When has it ever been 300? It was 200 from the get-go.

In Warcraft III, you can change the food limit. People need to learn how to use that editor.

I honestly cant remember a whole lot about SCII that early (it might have been 300 but no one really cared).

Regardless, he wants to know if normal melee matches should have a 300 cap. But what I really want is for melee games to have adjustable caps (other RTSs can do it).

[Bisso]

I forsee laggy screens with a 12 players 300/300...

But I don't rly care. But I just wonder why putting it to 300 while 200/200 is quiet alot and wasn't that common in normal (no $$$$) maps.

[MattII]

Maybe we could use the System they used in Cossacks, ie, set a limit on the total number of units, and divide by the number of players, ie for a limit of 2400, that gives 8 players 300 each, or 12 players 200 each.

[imdrunkontea]

so 1v1 has 1200/player?

that'd be sick...haha

[screw_ball69]

so 1v1 has 1200/player?

that'd be sick...haha

that could be epic.

[Kimera757]

I foresee a new type of map.

"Screw fastest. I want mass!"

[After7days]

w/e blizzard feels right after beta