Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 87 of 87

Thread: Hated SC II units?

  1. #81

    Default Re: Hated SC II units?

    hellion buggy.

    hydralisk and mutualisk. always usable and massable all around units should be nerf or remove. stalkers looks great, but gameplay its kinda imba unless nerf.

  2. #82

    Default Re: Hated SC II units?

    I like all the units.


    Favorites are...

    Thor.
    Hellion.
    Infestor.

    "lol"

    No really I like all the units currently ;d
    "No matter what side of the argument you are on, you always find people on your side that you wish were on the other."
    Be sure to check out the best #$*&#$ video game show ever Epileptic Gaming and the lastest episode on youtube NOW IN HD
    - Oh its a egg I wonder whats inside! =)

  3. #83

    Default Re: Hated SC II units?

    Quote Originally Posted by RODTHEGOD View Post
    What is the speed upgrade? make intercepters fly faster? because that doesn't seem too impressive to me
    Flying faster also means their attack speed has increased.
    Find Humanity ... Assimilate ... Learn ... Evolve.

  4. #84
    Amph's Avatar Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    61

    Default Re: Hated SC II units?

    i find that the archon is really boring, give him something or scrap it...

    not necessarily a spell , but something related to his attack

    example: a damage opponent units decrease...for each blow of the archon the enemy units lost 1 damage points, until get off at 1 damage, if the unit run away, the full damage will be restored in 3 sec..or something like this

  5. #85

    Default Re: Hated SC II units?

    Quote Originally Posted by Amph View Post
    i find that the archon is really boring, give him something or scrap it...

    not necessarily a spell , but something related to his attack

    example: a damage opponent units decrease...for each blow of the archon the enemy units lost 1 damage points, until get off at 1 damage, if the unit run away, the full damage will be restored in 3 sec..or something like this
    In one Version Archons had Feedback, just like Dark Archons in SC1, dunno why they scraped it, it actually was really good and made Archon useful, since we have Immortals for Tanks now.
    "Living for the Swarm!"

  6. #86

    Default Re: Hated SC II units?

    Terran:
    Thor: I'm not so much against the Thor, but what it removed from the original Terran line-up. The Goliaths were easy to produce, not very expensive, but provided the Terran with powerful anti-air rather than relying on Marines. Yes, the Thor's cost and power are assumed to be proportional with the cost and power of the Goliaths, but I've had quite a few games when a quickly produced Goliath saved my base, and I don't think a Thor would've been built quick enough or moved swiftly enough to save me in an equivalent situation.


    Zerg:
    Brood Lord: I don't hate the Brood Lord. I kinda like the idea of a guardian-like unit shooting broodlings at the enemy. What I don't like is how it morphs from the Corruptor and no longer the Mutalisk. The Corruptor is strictly an ATA unit, and morphs into an ATG unit. So if you need to get some Brood Lords, you're forced to build Corruptors first. You could say "But Zero, isn't this the same as the Hydralisk losing its GTA when it morphs to the Lurker?" Well, no. Why? Because even if you really only needed Lurkers, the Hydralisk was still useful against both ground and air. If you're quickly trying to build Brood Lords against a ground-heavy opponent, and they attack while you still have a number of Corruptors, you're screwed because they can't even help you in the slightest until they morph, and by then, your base may already half gone and your economy crippled beyond repair. At least with the Hydralisk situation, even if you would be better off with Lurkers, the Hydralisks can at least provide some defense.


    Protoss:
    Mothership: As with the Thor, I like the Mothership, but I don't care for what got sacrificed for it to be here. The Protoss need a more accessible tier 3 (air) spellcaster/support unit. True, many of our Protoss games never reached arbiters when playing competitively, but it was still a unit with useful abilities that could easily turn the tide of battle with by freezing a group of enemy units in a stasis field or recalling a number of forces behind enemy defense. Personally, I would rather see a Protoss spellcaster/support unit, likely gas heavy like the arbiter, with a far more destructive Mothership.
    [CENTER]

  7. #87

    Default Re: Hated SC II units?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zero View Post
    What I don't like is how it morphs from the Corruptor and no longer the Mutalisk.
    What in the fricken hell? Who's bright idea was that one? What a stupid thing to do...

    Ugh.. this is ridiculous... wow, i cant believe how stupid that is...

    Mutalisk < Corruptor < Broodlord

    ...wth...
    http://sclegacy.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=23&dateline=124193888  6

    Please stop the spread of Mass Effect!!!

Similar Threads

  1. The Implementation of New Units into the Expansions
    By RODTHEGOD in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 08-05-2009, 03:30 PM
  2. Does Force Field trap units inside?
    By Norfindel in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-23-2009, 12:03 PM
  3. In actuality, can anti-air buildings hit aerial units?
    By Pandonetho in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-20-2009, 10:05 AM
  4. Which units do you want to be male/female?
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-18-2009, 08:05 PM
  5. APC units - getting them to work in StarCraft II UMS
    By Kimera757 in forum StarCraft Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-19-2009, 09:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •