Printable View
But then it couldn't be attacked, which is half the point.Quote:
Id rather have a quick ability that allows me to grab some minerals all the way across the map.
You don't want to obsolete expanding entirely; you just want to provide a useful alternative mechanism that can provide interesting strategic play.
Does it have to be attackable?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicol Bolas
Also you can still have it be attackable without it being a Ferrying Creature. And expansions wont be obsolete as long as you get more minerals from expanding than from distance mining.
If it can't be attacked, then there's nothing your opponent can do to punish you for trying to do it.Quote:
Does it have to be attackable?
The only things in the game that can be attacked are units and buildings (neutral or otherwise). So it would have to be one of those to be able to be attacked.Quote:
Also you can still have it be attackable without it being a Ferrying Creature.
And I never said it "ferryed" anything anywhere. I said it pulled minerals from a patch, and could place those minerals in an arbitrary location.
Yes. Why is that a problem?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicol Bolas
So like a unit picks up minerals and then puts them somewhere else. Isnt that ferrying?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicol Bolas
In terms of the limitations you set Archer, I like Nicol's idea. Make a large unit than can go harvest one full mineral patch (like a max of 1500 or something) and then dump it anywhere in the form of a new mineral patch. This unit would have a very high gathering rate (either in terms of speed, in terms of chunks, or a bit of both), and, when finished, it would notify you of its completion. Then, the unit would need to be taken back to your base to be emptied. This shouldn't be automated because the unit has a very high risk of running into enemy units that could destroy it. It would be best to require the player to move it to a site and then back to base.
It makes it less interesting. It's something each player just does as often as possible, rather than developing strategies and mindgames around it. It just becomes another form of "build more workers."Quote:
Yes. Why is that a problem?
If it's attackable, then players will now be on the look-out for them. Map control will be even more important, as will raiding units like Reapers and so forth. The "ninja mineral steal", where you send your cargo carrier to an unlikely location, isn't possible if it weren't actually dangerous to do so.
Also if it's attackable, then you don't have to make up arbitrary rules about why it doesn't work in the presence of someone else's expansion. You just let them deal with it, or suffer the indignity of having minerals stolen out from under their own workers.
Not in the same way that workers ferry minerals around. It's not automatic for one, since both where you want to load from and where you want to drop the cargo are strategic.Quote:
Isnt that ferrying?
It seems like a very risky idea and dissuades you from actually expanding because you're taking away from prospective spots.
It can also be abused since minerals can serve as indestructible walls.
lol this is a good point. All you'd have to do is put a few of these at your ramp or an expansion.Quote:
It can also be abused since minerals can serve as indestructible walls.
There are ways around that. For example, you can have the mineral patches it creates be destructable. This also allows you to attack someone's gathered minerals.Quote:
It can also be abused since minerals can serve as indestructible walls.
Here's a thought that just occured to me, not sure if it's been brought up before.
What about an obelisk that's capped at one, given really REALLY good abilities to compete with PC (like abilities that the mothership should have...) and allowing it to go into a warpy phasey mode (like the old photon cannon) to allow it to move around. It wouldn't require pylon power and would be a strong building.
Flame away, just throwing the idea out there.