Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Wicked. I was just wacthing some diggity vids. It was fate!! :p I'll get on to wacthing these after I finsih his other ones. A day filled with diggity! :D
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Quote:
Edit: I still don't get it how youtube tags work
They're search terms basically.
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
I love the guys at SC2GG, but this video isn't so much commentary as it is a stream of thought about the status of SC2 :P.
Part of it's because Diggity isn't quite up to date as we are with the status of SC2. He makes quite a few mistakes (such as not realising that the Zerg player canceled his hatchery when the Banshees appeared and that he burrowed his drone).
He pretty much ignores the game entirely (I thought he'd talk about how badly the Zerg player was producing compared to David Kim, for example) and focuses on his theories of SC2's pro scene and the future of e-sports.
It's a bit weird to watch because the visuals feel completely pointless :P. 'Watching' this just feels like listening to a podcast :P (not a bad one, though! It's just that it doesn't have too much to do with the match itself).
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Quote:
such as not realising that the Zerg player canceled his hatchery when the Banshees appeared and that he burrowed his drone
To be fair, not many people notice that.
I loved it anyway, and as always, I agree with what his God like voice tells me. We need GM over the internet! Have a good day Grunt, and know that I always will love you. You too, PerfectTear. :p
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Aldrius
They're search terms basically.
Lol ,i don't mean those tags:D I wannted to post the actual video here and not just the link.
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
I wasnt expecting that much from this vid. Like the guy said, both Blizz commentators in the original vid had it pretty good (and was probably staged/not live so they could practice). I am not sure what he could have said more, and he said what he could say to add something new, about the he dont know why they are just harassing and leaving when they could dominate the ennemy. I think he is right, the reapers could be very powerful if kim used them to attack the main base. , leaving bombs in money then jumping down again, stuff like that.
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Hm i love those Commentators ^^ my favorite is Cholera ;) I hope they will keep commenting on SC2 Beta videos and normal SC2 Videos, they are great, hype up the game so much ;)
Edit: LOOOL i said everything he does in this video :D :D :D But i didnt watch it then though ^^
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
I think he has a good point: the Zerg lack the mobility of the Terran and Protoss and will be at the mercy of much of their harassment. And obviously HSMs are going to RAPE mineral lines.
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Quote:
my favorite is Cholera
Here, here!! Though Diggity is a damn close second. :)
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Quote:
I think he has a good point: the Zerg lack the mobility of the Terran and Protoss and will be at the mercy of much of their harassment.
Right, because the Zerg don't have a cheap harassment unit (Mutalisk) nor do they have the ability to summon their army at an arbitrary location on the map with minimal legwork (Nydus). And none of this is on top of having Overlord transports.
Just because someone isn't using the race's features doesn't mean they don't exist.
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Well I guess we'll find out! It's all theory, but it just feels like with reapers and stalkers the zerg have a disadvantage not having a cliff jumper (not that I think they necessarily need one - I'm as big an advocate for racial diversity as you can get).
Re: DiggitySC sc2 commentary
Zerg don't need a cliff jumper because they have Mutalisks. That's the bottom line, let it go.