Look at this beauty:
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...on-large01.png
Oh man i cant wait to see this on action.
Printable View
Look at this beauty:
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...on-large01.png
Oh man i cant wait to see this on action.
!!! where'd you get that???
although tbh, it looks kind of like they just ripped off the top of the immortal and called it a dragoon.
Famous Blizzard MPQs
I knew where the MPQs where and lost interest, at first. But, after the patch, I actually wanted to know where the main beta MPQs where.
Anyone knows where you can find the main MPQs?
Wow! That looks amazing! I really, really hope Blizzard touches up the Protoss to have all their units on par with the Zealot and Dragoon.
thank you KadajSouba .looks better than stalker , great.
What a badass! "The remaining Dragoons have become Immortals" my BUTT! I fully expect to see some of these bad boys in the singleplayer campaign! :)
Seeing that wireframe made me think, "why not just get rid of stalkers and bring back dragoons with blink?"
Oh man, I can't wait to see/hear the Dragoon of SC2. That was always one of my fave units from the original game. So ominous...
Brutalisk
http://sclegacy.com/forums/../images...sk-large01.png
Corsair
http://sclegacy.com/forums/../images...rt-large01.png
Still think Corsair looks cool - I say bring it back with Phoenix abilities - I really ain't likin the Phoenix model.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blazur
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliban113
No. Just no.Quote:
Originally Posted by Maul
Corsair looks great, I wasn't expecting to see them in-game! Wonder if Scouts and Super-Carriers will show up, too.
Ooh, I hope Valkyries show up, too! I'd love to give the Viking's air mode the Valkyrie's air attack for a custom game. :>
Glad I can finally chat about these now. :D
I was stoked when I was the Dragoon & Corsair, I'm looking forward to seeing them.
It's interesting that the Brutalisk & the Old Infestor Model aren't like the other Zerg Wireframes. Still kinda sad that the Swarm Guardian model doesn't look to have made it in, but oh well.
I'm kinda curious as to why the main icons look like they're drawn, rather than going for a more realistic look:
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...n-gas-zerg.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...upply-zerg.png
X :cool:
Was the Corsair called by another name at one time? The one that looks like a Corsair is called an Escort.
The SC2 dragoon looks exactly like the dragoons from SC:BW cinematics. I guess it took 12 years for Blizzard to be able to make units look the way they want them too.
Not that I'm aware of, but there was a point where the Carrier could optionally train an escort ship instead of interceptors...so that may be what we're looking at. Don't believe that change lasted very long. Perhaps we're getting a glimpse at an expansion unit?Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash
The Corsair was a Protoss flyer introduced in SC:BW, and it looks pretty much like that (except a bit less angular). We never saw an Escort, the ability was removed from the Carrier too quickly for a screenshot to be created.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash
Since they were just testing Escorts, they probably didn't bother to give them a full design job. So they took an off-the-shelf model (Corsair) and called it an Escort.
where'd you gets pictures , please more...
Right on the homepage, dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio19
I still can't believe people are getting more excited about news of in-campaign Dragoons than confirmation of these in-game models:
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...or-large01.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...sh-large01.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...er-large01.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...nn-large01.png
A. I pretty much knew those were coming.Quote:
Originally Posted by mr. peasant
B. Had no stinking idea Dragoons were coming. Lore from the SC2 site(horribly outdated) stated that they were lost technology. Not only is that not true, we see Immortals produced in Frontline.
You forgot the most important one :D
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.png
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.png
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.png
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.pnghttp://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ss-obelisk.png
Also we finally got a glimpse of the new "Swarm Host". Click below to find out what it looks like!
Hidden Content:
It might be single player only. Im sure there will be UMS that will have them though. PC away Archer, PC away.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur
Has anyone been able to datamine any models from the beta yet?
Im betting PC will be a Single Player upgrade. Great for players that want to macro through the caimpaign. And micro players can always buy other upgrades.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow Archon
Looking at the portraits, am I the only one who wants to see the High Templar and Executor portraits switched?
I'm with you on this one... Wasn't it this way before anyways?Quote:
Originally Posted by ManjiSanji
Corsair looks poorly modelled.
We haven't seen the model yet to say for sure. It is fine with me, but Im sure they could do better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wankey
Originally, for the release, the Protoss Advisor portrait was what we see now as the High Templar portrait.Quote:
Originally Posted by sandwich_bird
Personally, to me, the current Advisor portrait looks more like what a High Templar should be; covered in robes and adornments. Personally, I think the High Templar model itself should look more ethereal and have a sense of flow to it, and that their death animation should be different and more dramatic than a Zealot's, but it might be too late for such things.
Ditto. However, Aldaris was killed and since Artanis is now the leader, it fits the lore.Quote:
Originally Posted by ManjiSanji
The high templar looks a little too stale. They just need to change his background to a Shukras background to make it look more in the field rather than in a building.
does not appear on my computer..go crazy
While I figured we'd probably get to play Raynor in a mission or two, I certainly didn't expect to be getting a chance to control Tosh, Horner and Swann as well. I mean... Swann?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow Archon
RIGHT. Now I can ask this too-
Who's Colonist Kachinsky?
http://sclegacy.com/images/uploaded/...ky-large01.png
X :cool:
Wasn't Kachinsky mentioned at a Blizzcon sneak peak of single player? Remember when it was first shown that we would buy our technology. Raynor walked in and I think it was Kachinsky who was talking to Swann then left. The colonist part is just a title. I mean they show Tosh and call him colonist as well when we know that he is a ghost.
Dragoon i just Immortal with the top part removed. Nothing new to see here.
Wouldn't make any sense. The High Templar's portrait is it's face. Like, zero in on the model. That's exactly what it's face looks like.Quote:
Originally Posted by ManjiSanji
Which I recognize, I'm just saying it doesn't fit what the unit represents.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldrius
When I see the portrait, I don't think, "That's a High Templar."
When I see the Advisor, I think, "That's a High Templar." The question was whether or not I was the only one, and it seems I'm not.
The subtext of the question was, "Does it feel right?" Not, "Does it match the unit if you zoomed in on it?"
Well it feels right because it's exactly what the unit looks like. :PQuote:
Originally Posted by ManjiSanji
Not true. The model used for the portrait is created independently of the in-game unit's model. That's why you can see the pilots for Terran vehicles and why the Sentry's portrait has the tail of its old model. If the portrait was indeed simply a close-up of the in-game model, neither of these instances would be possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldrius