http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf6fW8s8d1s
00:52 - awesomeness :p.
Printable View
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf6fW8s8d1s
00:52 - awesomeness :p.
Obviously the winner of the last Aiur cross country. :p
Did you know that Zealots could sometimes bug in BroodWar and start walking with that speed, like that they have charge, but in SC1. I lol'd when I saw that. Because of that scene in SC BW, this isn't anything new to me. :p
very minor bug, cool to see anyway.
awsome game btw.
That game was a pretty crazy one.
It gives me the impression, that teching is not worth as much as it used to be. Maybe because they lowered all the armor bonusses of the high-tech units, so they're much weaker to low-tier units.
EMP is the strongest anti-spellcaster ability in the game. I'm not sure it's ok for it to remove all energy in such a big radius, not to mention that it will remove all shields from Immortals, rendering them very weak. The AoE looks pretty big.
I disagree. I think it was just because the protoss had inferior micro.Quote:
Originally Posted by Norfindel
If you see part 3 of that game, the 'toss actually wins because he
pushes with tier 3 units while the terran only had tier 2.
But the Mothership and Carrier have only 2 Armor now. The Carrier used to have 4 in BW. That's half the Armor.
Marines used to do only 2 dmg to Carriers before. Now they get 4 dmg, it's twice as effective.
Yes, but now Bigger units do a lot more damage to a smaller ones since there is no damage reduction. But still, Carrier's armor is lowered which is good thing. That means you can fight with Marines vs. Carrier, well few Carriers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Norfindel
The Carrier didn't have any damage reduction, it had a Normal attack, not Explosive. But it now has is a higher attack power. Still don't like the idea of the unit being easier to bring down by low-tiered units, it costs a bunch of resources.Quote:
Originally Posted by RamiZ
The Battlecruiser didn't lose any armor, got a higher attack, extra HP, and costs the same than in BW.
What do you mean by that ? The interceptors deal more damage or what exactly ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Norfindel
i think its good that the carrier is somewhat fragile if any enemy is allowed up close and personal.. i mean, there are plenty of ways to deal with marines, and we want to see units combined throughout the game, not jsut masses of carreirs as soon as they reach that tech. also 5x2 damage per interceptor is ALOT more than the 6x1 they had in sc/bw ... finally they appear to launch quicker too.
Quite a lot more: 5x2 instead of 6.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zigurd
Battlecruiser also does: 6x6 instead of 25.
I think BC"s do 8x10 ATG and 8x6 ATA,But because the Attack rate is so fast all we see is non-stop volleys of 10 and 6 hitting enemy's ,damn so cool :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Norfindel
Yep, i checked in sc2armory and the wikia, and they don't even list a number of attacks anymore. It's a Fast 10 dmg attack against ground, and a Fast 6 attack against air.Quote:
Originally Posted by arthas
And when they say Fast they mean it :D