I can tell you that when/if SC:L posts this frontpage, it will be with proof and not speculation.
Printable View
I can tell you that when/if SC:L posts this frontpage, it will be with proof and not speculation.
I have allot of respect for the Starcraft-source community. Some might remember that they were the ones that gave us Mr Jack. However, and I say this as a blanket statement, anyone, any community member, representitve, admin, even TL, even SCL, even Blizzard, can give faulty information if they believe it is real. Weve seen this countless times from all parties and Im sure weve all learned by now to take everything with a large grain of salt.
Hmm, hmm, hmmhmm!
HMM HMM HMMMMM!!!
I can see your smurf avatar doing that in an incredibly creepy voice...Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosSmurf
and it scares me.
~LoA
Yeah I fucking love this new avatar.Quote:
Originally Posted by LordofAscension
Interesting thread... on many counts. :)
Ontopic: I think the FAQ could be legit in parts and fake in others. The length and depth of each question, as previously noted by others, bears this out. However, I would like to post a theory: Could we be looking at perhaps a blizzard staffer's FAQ rough draft/in development copy, as though someone was merely trying to anticipate common, basic questions?
Me too.Quote:
That's totally my opinion, I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter
Funny thing is, it doesn't matter whether it's real or not.
Offtopic: @ChaosSmurf: I didn't hear the creepy voice until LoA mentioned it. Now almost all of your posts have a scary vibe. Hums twilight zone theme...
@LoA: You just had to say that. Lol.
I say legit. But when it comes to StarCraft II, I'm universally gullible.
Case in point: I thought for sure the actual game would be in my hands in 2009.
HAHAHA, YOU FOOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by //MavericK\\
:p
either way, lets just hope it comes this week
When the game was originally announced, of course.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosSmurf