Old Carrier vs New Carrier

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid

It should have been a Zerg unit

---

The new Brood Lord is kind of a Zerg version of the carrier.

It would have been cool having a Zerg carrier though. Maybe a Behemoth or Leviathan that spits out little Scourges.

As for the original question, I agree with electricmole... I like the new graphic, but it should be fatter considering its got a bunch of little ships inside it.

Wow pro new-carrier people. Im surprised. Where were you guys before?

I want this...

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/st...SC2_Cncpt1.jpg

kick sc2 "tempestcarrier"

I agree, new one is better except that it looks too fragile. They need to update it with more bulk.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scorpio19

I want this...http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/st...SC2_Cncpt1.jpg

---

Thats basically the new carrier minus some details. They even show the new model in the picture.

Old Carrier +1

The new carrier is basically a reskinned version of a different unit that meant to serve a different role. It's an ad-hoc reskin, and it shows. I don't see how anyone can possibly justify the new carrier...especially when the excuse for bringing it back was iconic status. It makes no sense.

Old carrier wins IMO. It's just too bad there isn't a third "better Carrier than both of these" option.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur

Thats basically the new carrier minus some details. They even show the new model in the picture.

---

There are a bunch of differences which I've pointed out repeatedly in other threads. In fact, the only real similarities are that it's golden and has hoops; practically everything else is different.

And that's not the new model in the background; it's the tempest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur

Thats basically the new carrier minus some details. They even show the new model in the picture.

---

i would like the new carrier in game model, if it looked like that. but it doesn't. the old carrier looked better than the tempest carrier wannabe

Old carrier for me. Although I might need to see the new carrier with its polished armor (take the current mothership as an example).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gradius

The new carrier is basically a reskinned version of a different unit that meant to serve a different role. It's an ad-hoc reskin, and it shows. I don't see how anyone can possibly justify the new carrier...especially when the excuse for bringing it back was iconic status. It makes no sense.

---

On that subject Id like to once again complain about the muta I mean corruptor evolution. A good model but its all too obviously they made it to be a mutalisk evolution and didnt change anything when moving it over to the corruptor.

http://www.starcraftsector.net/style.../BroodLord.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gradius

There are a bunch of differences which I've pointed out repeatedly in other threads. In fact, the only real similarities are that it's golden and has hoops; practically everything else is different.

And that's not the new model in the background; it's the tempest.

---

Yah I think thats more of a semantics arguement than anythings else. I think of it as Banana model and goatskull model (whatever the minor details and color changes).