Old Carrier vs New Carrier
Ive seen allot of people complain about the new carrier model. Anyway I am really curious what the actual break down is and I cant recall seeing a current poll about it. So lets see what you guys think.
http://www.scmillennium.com/Images/u...ss/carrier.jpg
http://www.sc2armory.com/img/protoss/units/carrier.jpg
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
First! :p
Old Carrier in all his might.
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
I hate the Carrier. Period.
But I figure if Blizzard is going to keep the unit because its iconic, the least they should do is keep the goddamn unit model.
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DemolitionSquid
I hate the Carrier. Period.
Thats a new one. Why do you hate the Carrier?
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
I like the new model better but wish it had slightly more bulk.
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ArcherofAiur
Thats a new one. Why do you hate the Carrier?
Not new. I have always hated the Carrier. I thought that was obvious.
It should have been a Zerg unit, and its broken.
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DemolitionSquid
Not new. I have always hated the Carrier. I thought that was obvious.
It should have been a Zerg unit, and its broken.
How is it broken? It hard to get, expensive and can be countered. You just dont like it cause it has mass effect :p
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ArcherofAiur
How is it broken? It hard to get, expensive and can be countered. You just dont like it cause it has mass effect :p
That's what I said... broken.
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
I like the new model better but wish it had slightly more bulk.
Re: Old Carrier vs New Carrier
I'm in favor of the new model. It better fits the Protoss' current theme of 'advanced race = sleek with glowy lights'. The old Carrier simply doesn't achieve this aesthetic. It's almost reaching Terran levels of chunkiness in its robustness.