The Gifts of StarCraft 2

You guys need to stop, take a step back, and consider psychology.




Its not what people say but why they say it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur

You guys need to stop, take a step back, and consider psychology.




Its not what people say but why they say it.

---

Hm. This is like Pictionary. And you saw THE word, and now you are smart with us.
Please. "Consider psychology" ? Wha? Emotions? Happy dance? What exactly?
This is a bad clue.

Oh, no! I think we've lost Archer...

The PTR was a bust. If something is coming from that direction I couldn't find it.

I read that Battle.net was updated in 2009. Also, the migration from WoW accounts to Battle.net happened in November, 2009. If most of the backend is done, maybe it is only the SC2 interface that is needing to be tested.

So, now I am *not* going to poke around my Battle.net account looking for changes...

Hidden Content:

Actually, the last time I had this much fun waiting with the community was about six months ago when a guy on TeamLiquid claimed beta was starting, and if he was wrong they should ban him.

You can guess how that turned out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bobo

Hm. This is like Pictionary. And you saw THE word, and now you are smart with us.
Please. "Consider psychology" ? Wha? Emotions? Happy dance? What exactly?
This is a bad clue.

---

Its not really a clue. Its a different perspective. It allows you to figure out much more than you ever could from the clues.

I agree on that boss. Also phenomenology might give us a hint as to the subject from which those bits were taken from.

All I'm seeing is that Beta was rescheduled to an earlier date because of progress in Battle Net 2.0.

The team had been working hard and late, doing two shifts, rolling on, without breaks to get this done.

edit:
Unless if there's anything more of a good news than that.

Also, 32ms is a mechanical thing. It points to speed. Storage, or even oscillation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur

Its not really a clue. Its a different perspective. It allows you to figure out much more than you ever could from the clues.

---

My feeblemind is giving up... Gotta go study for exams. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur

You guys need to stop, take a step back, and consider psychology.




Its not what people say but why they say it.

---

...wow?

if you want to decipher these clues (which is probably impossible anyways), then it is definitely WHAT you are saying, not WHY

the why is completely irrelevant and probably already known in this context (you're bored, trolling, want to sit on a high horse, etc)

what people say vs why they say it is completely relative to the context of what you are looking for when analyzing the data

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GGTeMpLaR

...wow?

if you want to decipher these clues (which is probably impossible anyways), then it is definitely WHAT you are saying, not WHY

the why is completely irrelevant and probably already known in this context (you're bored, trolling, want to sit on a high horse, etc)

what people say vs why they say it is completely relative to the context of what you are looking for when analyzing the data

---

I guess we could agree that the why of Gifted's actions is to enlighten. The good news part is still debatable.

No GGTemplar. In allot of ways the clues are almost distractions. They hold truth but only so far as the why allows. The reason for the posts, the why, is where you find the real truth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GnaReffotsirk

I guess we could agree that the why of Gifted's actions is to enlighten. The good news part is still debatable.

---

um no it definitely isn't

at least if it is, it is certainly not prioritized as a motive