Modern Warfare 2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by screw_ball69

Because it take that much more coordination than a keyboard and mouse.
last I checked almost any fps on console has some sort of aim assist.

---

Then you didn't look very hard.

Seems like just about every fps I have played on console lately it acts like there is a magnet in the crosshairs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by screw_ball69

Seems like just about every fps I have played on console lately it acts like there is a magnet in the crosshairs.

---

Stop lying to yourself and to us.

Ya caught me, I used teh Hax

So squid, what console FPS games DO you play then hm?

I got it the same day I got my PS3. It's the first shooter I ever played on console, and the first next-gen game I played for more than a few minutes... and I beat 2/3 of the campaign, on Regular, in a couple of hours (haven't gone back since). That should say something.

The campaign is pretty ridiculous, but it's super cinematic and most of the missions are quite different, which makes it fun. Except Brazil. Brazil can go die. If I have to go back there after that last mission, heads will roll, and I'm not talkin' in-game.

Multiplayer has been tougher for a newb like myself, accustomed to PC as I am... but I'm making do. The one thing I'll say is there's some serious balance issues. On a lot of maps (Wasteland comes to mind), helicopters are SERIOUSLY overpowered. Basically the only way to not be killed by them ten times in a row is to sit in a hut for 5 minutes doing nothing. Yes, it's as lame as it sounds.

I've been having internet troubles, but I'm pretty sure that's my wireless acting up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pure.Wasted

I got it the same day I got my PS3. It's the first shooter I ever played on console, and the first next-gen game I played for more than a few minutes... and I beat 2/3 of the campaign, on Regular, in a couple of hours (haven't gone back since). That should say something.

The campaign is pretty ridiculous, but it's super cinematic and most of the missions are quite different, which makes it fun. Except Brazil. Brazil can go die. If I have to go back there after that last mission, heads will roll, and I'm not talkin' in-game.

Multiplayer has been tougher for a newb like myself, accustomed to PC as I am... but I'm making do. The one thing I'll say is there's some serious balance issues. On a lot of maps (Wasteland comes to mind), helicopters are SERIOUSLY overpowered. Basically the only way to not be killed by them ten times in a row is to sit in a hut for 5 minutes doing nothing. Yes, it's as lame as it sounds.

I've been having internet troubles, but I'm pretty sure that's my wireless acting up.

---

Welcome to Call od Duty multiplayer.
seriously tho, Brazil did fucking suck...tho the last ditch run across rooftops was cool.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid

FPS should only be played on console. Using a mouse to aim makes me physically sick.

ANALOG 4EVAR!

---

False... Joysticks are for flying planes or a sport game. Good try though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dynamiK-

False... Joysticks are for flying planes or a sport game. Good try though.

---

Analog is the superior UI for most types of gaming. Flying, Sport, and FPS. Deal with it.

Nah, it gives the player less control than a mouse and keyboard. Way less.

Battlefield owns the hell out of Gaylo any day.

Also, plain and simply, sports games are gay, and good luck with trying to get any good RTS onto a console.