Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
Quote:
All of these are concepts he did for Legacy of the Void. He already had the hybrids and all unit designs from the previous expansions to draw on.
Wait a minute, what? So what you're saying is Blizzard considered improving the Hybrid design leading up to LotV, had their artists crank out fantastic concepts, then went "Naww, let's roll with what we've got!"
What. The hell.
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
Found some interesting concept art in the old WoL artbook.
Didn't think the Cobra, Hercules Tank and several other things had actual art, but apparently they do.
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Visions of Khas
Wait a minute, what? So what you're saying is Blizzard considered improving the Hybrid design leading up to LotV, had their artists crank out fantastic concepts, then went "Naww, let's roll with what we've got!"
What. The hell.
I mean, they did design a bunch of new Hybrid units for LotV. The dominators, those flying ones, etc. And they made a cutscene model of the hybrid reaver, so could have been looking at potential new details there. idk
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
The only new hybrid concept for LotV was the airborne Nemesis. Amon's form is a modified Reaver, and Dominators are simply Destroyers with widgets.
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
I still think my idea that the xel'naga actually looked like adorable stuffed animals is the best idea, precisely because it actively defies the audience's expectations of them as off-brand protoss. It gives them a distinct visual aesthetic from the zerg and protoss, since cute and furry is the opposite of those. It explains why the protoss and zerg beat them at combat too.
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mislagnissa
I still think my idea that the xel'naga actually looked like adorable stuffed animals is the best idea, precisely because it actively defies the audience's expectations of them as off-brand protoss. It gives them a distinct visual aesthetic from the zerg and protoss, since cute and furry is the opposite of those. It explains why the protoss and zerg beat them at combat too.
Stop... :P
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mislagnissa
I still think my idea that the xel'naga actually looked like adorable stuffed animals is the best idea, precisely because it actively defies the audience's expectations of them as off-brand protoss. It gives them a distinct visual aesthetic from the zerg and protoss, since cute and furry is the opposite of those. It explains why the protoss and zerg beat them at combat too.
Subversion for subversion’s sake, narrative be damned. Okay, Rian Johnson.
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gradius
Stop... :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Visions of Khas
Subversion for subversion’s sake, narrative be damned. Okay, Rian Johnson.
Watch Puella Magi Madoka Magica if you do not believe me.
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
I have. Kyubey did nothing wrong.
Re: What other ways could the xel'naga been drawn like?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Visions of Khas
I have. Kyubey did nothing wrong.
(Try not to spoil anything. The series thrives on surprises.) Did you see the third movie? I got flashbacks to that episode of Grim Adventures titled “My Fair Mandy.”
It totally fits the xel’naga narrative before Metzen lost his marbles.