Printable View
How do you know? I also think that some of them will be reworked, and we will have new upgrades I guess, which will open a ton of new strategies and timings. And the unit pool is pretty big so I don't see why would we need 3 or more new units per race.Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio19
SC2 started with too many units. Each race could have easily had 2 less units in WoL.
I said that out of nowhere just to insinuate ridicule into the situation, and pretend that I could make it sound worse without any proof whatsoever. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Aldrius
Yeah... it's sad because terran and protoss don't need ANY new units...Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio19
Seriously, I can't believe people expect 20 units for each race by LotV... That would be IMPOSSIBLE to balance to the level at which SC BW was played professionally. Go buy a C&C game, they'll make as many useless units to captivate your attention for 15 minutes...
But then, speaking of CnC, Browder would say,
Hidden Content:
are you idiot? who talk abaut 20 units ??Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabber Wookie
12 years waiting and terran and protoss don't need ANY new units...new expentions new game ,no need any new unıts, you are the greatest player starcraft..idiot go play C&C buggy
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio19
English isnt your first language is it ?
Take this advice mate before you get flamed, Go back and triple check replies before making idiotic statements like that. I dont understand why your being so bashful there, he didnt say anything about having no expansions only that having too many units per race is a good way too unbalance a game, And there was no reason too call him an idiot.
Terran dont honestly need new units in my oppinion as they have everything covered.
Protoss on the other hand could do with a low tech harass unit and thats about it.
Zerg could do with a brand new anti air unit, Lisks are good but from my point of view they are too slow and too costly with upgrades Lings/Banes and Roaches leave them behind, Yes they move at relatively the same speed as other race units, but they are zergs only anti air unit thats commonly seen, they move too slow to push up if the enemy suddenly has a few banshees or Voids and by the time you get there your army even if its retreating will be decimated.
Why does everyone hate on C&C, its an amazing game for its age and its only Red Alert 2 and C&C4 that were crap.
This reminds me of how much I missed the good old days of illogical foreigner english-raping, bash posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio19
Good to see at least one of you hasn't been banned.
Indeed, it's like the essence of spychi, slickr, and dustinbrowder lives on. May god have mercy on their immortal souls.Quote:
Originally Posted by TychusFindlay
Who is slickr???
Don't get me started on slickR?: Worst poster in the history of this site and the Blizzforums (before we moved.) - although that DB guy definitely made a "run for the gold", lemmeh tell ye.
If only DSquid was foreign. We could get some real fun going.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gradius
Actually, we could just politely ask him to 'Google Translate' his posts into oblivion to make them more fun :D
Sorry I wasn't trying to bash on C&C as a whole. I loved the originals and even enjoyed playing RA3, but I enjoyed it for its campyness, the fun variation of units and their goofy gimmicks, and primarily because of J.K. Simmons and his awesomeness. However, SC2 is an e-sport to me, whereas C&C is just for fun casual play imo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckyyy
So I use it as an example when people expect new units all the time from SC2 just so they can have fun looking at them for 15 minutes at the cost of unbalancing an incredibly intricate, well balanced game (or at least getting there).
Someone who believes so much in his own views, and roots himself in his opinions. This is merely how I see him/her, taking from a few interactions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilice
He/she had some kind of forceful tone, and could probably projecting what he he experiences himself daily.
All this is speculation though, and totally just a knee jerk response, as I've had a terrible time dealing with how he/she approaches an argument.
In any case, I consider him/her someone who would put your ability to control your emotions to the test.
I miss that guy SlickR.
Edit: Oh, yeah, CnC is a cool game. It's too volatile though, and somewhat "slippery".
Nah, doubt it. The SlickR was the epitome of "illogical arguments", that if there were any arguments at all...Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliban113
I for one, do not miss any of the e-tards. Good riddance ArcherOfAuir.
YES!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by DemolitionSquid
yes. we are manner.
back on topic, found this on reddit:
http://i.imgur.com/UQreA.jpg
certainly brings a smile to my face and sets off my imagination...
it is surprising the unit can even move with the huge arms and back tumor
/stupid design
Its a Banellista. A Creepapult. An Arbalingst. A Zergbuchet.
A turtle-type creature that can withdraw into it's shell (while still beign mobile) and loose it's attack but have increased armor/hitpoints, and when outside it's shell (as picutred) it regains it's attack. Would solve the problem of Zerg units dieing before even reaching the battlefield.
I am pretty sure it won't... :/Quote:
Originally Posted by TheProgramer
And this really looks like Roach upgrade.
Baneling artillery. We need a Funny Starcraft Pictures section.
That would be Soooooo Cool!Quote:
Originally Posted by GnaReffotsirk
It could be a Lurker, seeing as there are spikes on its sides (although, what Zerg unit doesn't have spikes >_>)
Probably a Roach evolution, the shell makes it look like a tank unit.