Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LordofAscension
Jon played extensively and knows what he's talking about for the most part.
Sometime in the next few days, my comprehensive game review will be up as well.
~LoA
Be sure to let us know here instead of just putting it in one of those subforums no one goes to :D I'll be glad to add it to this topic.
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
Lol, Changeling, a 5 HP unit in Starcraft 2?
I hope the Roach regenerates much faster when burrowed than surfaced.
-Psi
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DemolitionSquid
The Roach hasn't lost its hyper-regen. Its regen rate was just decreased, and its max HP was increased. You guys need to learn to pay better attention.
Few more points:
- Base-focused Queen is a good thing. Jon is crazy for wanting her/them as an offensive unit or "hero."
- Immortal at RBay is a good thing. Its to purposely curb spamming them because their ability makes them so strong.
Huh? I thought the roach got a HP BOOST because it didn't have regen when unburrowed.
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wankey
Huh? I thought the roach got a HP BOOST because it didn't have regen when unburrowed.
Ok, we have conflicting reports then. The closest to that I heard was at one point the Roach had faster regen when buried than when unburied, but its regen was still faster than any other Zerg unit regardless.
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
I agree with everything he's said, he's seemed to nail everything right.
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pure.Wasted
The Roach is defined by his regeneration. If he doesn't have regeneration why is he still called the Roach?! This is too stupid for words.
Not only that, but it was actually one of the few innovative units the Zerg had. "YEAH, ZERG HAS TOO MUCH INNOVATION ALREADY, LET'S DUMB DOWN THEIR MOST INTERESTING UNIT." Only, you know, not.
(YES, I am a Roach fanboy. YES, it IS called for.)
Out of curiosity, for everyone that disagrees about conclusions drawn... which ones do you mean? Can't really discuss if you don't share your opinions. ;)
The only one I strongly disagree with is the Planetary Fortress -- just because it's overpowered and "fun" doesn't mean it's a good thing for the game. I really agree with his points re: the Raven however. HMS has "lame" written all over it. Always did. It needs to go.
Just for clarification, the Roach hasn't lost all of its regen ability - it's just significantly slower now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TychusFindlay
Be sure to let us know here instead of just putting it in one of those subforums no one goes to :D I'll be glad to add it to this topic.
It'll be up on the mainpage - with everything else.
~LoA
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
I never check the main page - with everyone else :D
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
After reading it I felt the game's delay was warranted. Something that has the potential to be a masterpiece shouldn't be rushed.
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
Ill wait for SC2 to come out and see what happens,
Re: Joneagle_X's (SC2F.org Admin) StarCraft 2 BlizzCon 09 Review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DemolitionSquid
Ok, we have conflicting reports then. The closest to that I heard was at one point the Roach had faster regen when buried than when unburied, but its regen was still faster than any other Zerg unit regardless.
Demosquid's explanation is what is currently happening in Warcraft 3 in Crypt Fiends. The HP boost doesn't make sense.