Visions of Khas
09-25-2017, 12:25 PM
So I'm guessing the Zerg would provide a taxanomic nightmare (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_nomenclature) for xeno-biologists.
How would one classify the multifarious zerg breeds? According to the BlackStone Project, the zerg breeds might properly be considered chimeras (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics)); the hydralisk for example, contained the genetic material of at least eight distinct species. Do the various strains and breeds constitute distinct speces (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciation) or subspecies? Probably not, considering one qualifying parameter for a species is reproductive. Though I'm unsure if that various zerg even classify as classical breeds (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breed), considering both the arbitrary nature of of "breeds" and the sheer genetic fluidity between not only the zerg types but also individuals of the same type; ie distinctions of Hydralisks between the First Great War/Brood War, and the Second Great War, Impaler strains vs Lurker strains, and genetic variety/mutation in individuals of the same type.
Would it then be more proper to classify zerg types the same as plants, considering "variety (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variety_(botany))," "cultivar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultivar)," and "form (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_(botany))" (considering each of these are ranks inferior to that of "species")? This may be the more productive route (http://blogs.sandiegozoo.org/2011/11/29/what-is-the-difference-between-a-species-and-a-variety/).
Thanks goes to the Internecivus raptus v . Linguafoeda acheronsis (https://arstechnica.com/the-multiverse/2014/08/the-throwaway-line-in-aliens-that-spawned-decades-of-confusion/) argument.
How would one classify the multifarious zerg breeds? According to the BlackStone Project, the zerg breeds might properly be considered chimeras (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_(genetics)); the hydralisk for example, contained the genetic material of at least eight distinct species. Do the various strains and breeds constitute distinct speces (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciation) or subspecies? Probably not, considering one qualifying parameter for a species is reproductive. Though I'm unsure if that various zerg even classify as classical breeds (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breed), considering both the arbitrary nature of of "breeds" and the sheer genetic fluidity between not only the zerg types but also individuals of the same type; ie distinctions of Hydralisks between the First Great War/Brood War, and the Second Great War, Impaler strains vs Lurker strains, and genetic variety/mutation in individuals of the same type.
Would it then be more proper to classify zerg types the same as plants, considering "variety (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variety_(botany))," "cultivar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultivar)," and "form (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_(botany))" (considering each of these are ranks inferior to that of "species")? This may be the more productive route (http://blogs.sandiegozoo.org/2011/11/29/what-is-the-difference-between-a-species-and-a-variety/).
Thanks goes to the Internecivus raptus v . Linguafoeda acheronsis (https://arstechnica.com/the-multiverse/2014/08/the-throwaway-line-in-aliens-that-spawned-decades-of-confusion/) argument.