Go Back   StarCraft: Legacy Forums > StarCraft Forums > StarCraft II Discussion
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Gradius
11-27-2009, 08:24 PM  #1
Gradius's Avatar
Administrator
Full Article.
 

Gradius is offline   Reply With Quote
sandwich_bird
11-27-2009, 09:18 PM  #2
sandwich_bird's Avatar
Moderator
Worst game so far. Z was really bad. He had all the map and he didn't build drones in all his expo but really he lost because he kept wasting his money away. I mean with all those bases go Ultralisk! stop making zerglings and mutalisks. His mutalisks harass didn't do crap.
 

sandwich_bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Kacaier
11-27-2009, 10:31 PM  #3
Kacaier's Avatar
Member
Agh! The zerg guy actually had the game in the bag. The turning point was that bad assault on the planetary fortress. Also, he keeps building the banelings out in the open. That's real smart.

But seriously, something needs to be done about the Planetary Fortress. I like how it prevents the guy from getting a mineral overdrive, but that fortress is literally a fortress. It takes too long to destroy it, versus the Terran guy destroying the hatchery and then making it back to defend the expo. And then you have SCVs repairing it as well?
 

Kacaier is offline   Reply With Quote
GRUNT
11-28-2009, 12:16 AM  #4
Member
I agree that the Zerg player should have won :[.

Before the Terran's 3rd Command Center was upgraded to a Planetary Fortress, he had to lift it off because it was going to be killed by Zerglings - I think that the Zerg player had an opportunity there to snipe it off with his Corruptors, but they were just chilling further off because he pulled them back :[.

And yeah - the Zerg player looked like he was enjoying a much higher income than the Terran, what with his five bases (at one point, I think) vs two :[. Either his drone count wasn't that high, or he really did just throw away more money on Banelings than it may have seemed. I really don't think his Banelings were cost-effective :[. Then there was that time which a hunter-seeker missile (or two) blew up one of his huge Baneling clumps. It took out two Ravens as well, but I think it worked out better for the Terran player.
 

GRUNT is offline   Reply With Quote
kxr1der
11-28-2009, 01:11 AM  #5
Junior Member
HSM is too OP for lower level play imo
 

kxr1der is offline   Reply With Quote
Grrblt
11-28-2009, 05:29 AM  #6
Junior Member
Do you guys know why the changelings didn't transform? I thought just by walking into range of the other team they should've transformed into marines.
 

Grrblt is offline   Reply With Quote
RamiZ
11-28-2009, 06:15 AM  #7
RamiZ's Avatar
Member
@ GRUNT
Terran player lost about 4-5 Ravens with HSM don't know which part of video was that, third or second. And he had a lot of opportunities to win this game, but his Corruptor control was really bad :/ Pretty much same with Banelings, Mutas wasn't so bad after all And I am happy to see that you can still effectively harass with them. Also I think that he would do much better if he made Infestors with Fungal Growth to stop moving of those M&M so he could actually blow up them with Banelings.

@ Grrblt
Seem that you have to click on the opponents unit or something like that :/ Dunno why really or you have to stand, cause you can't transfor while moving.
Last edited by RamiZ; 11-28-2009 at 06:18 AM.
 

"Living for the Swarm!"

RamiZ is offline   Reply With Quote
TychusFindlay
11-28-2009, 08:24 AM  #8
TychusFindlay's Avatar
Member
That missile on those Banelings that destroyed almost all of them seems pretty imbalanced. It was quite funny to see though I bet the Zerg player shit backwards.
 

TychusFindlay is offline   Reply With Quote
RamiZ
11-28-2009, 08:53 AM  #9
RamiZ's Avatar
Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by TychusFindlay View Post
That missile on those Banelings that destroyed almost all of them seems pretty imbalanced. It was quite funny to see though I bet the Zerg player shit backwards.
Dunno, I would gladly lost all banelings that way if he lose all Ravens that way ;DDD
 

"Living for the Swarm!"

RamiZ is offline   Reply With Quote
sandwich_bird
11-28-2009, 11:45 AM  #10
sandwich_bird's Avatar
Moderator
Quote:
Originally Posted by kxr1der View Post
HSM is too OP for lower level play imo
Not at all. Might as well say that psi storm is OP then. Same kind of thing except HSM is easier to dodge.
 

sandwich_bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GStar 2009 Videos TychusFindlay StarCraft II Discussion 147 12-30-2009 07:32 PM
GStar 2009 StarCraft 2 Protoss vs. Terran Gameplay Video Gradius StarCraft II Discussion 5 11-28-2009 04:24 PM
GStar 2009 StarCraft 2 Zerg vs. Terran Gameplay Video Gradius StarCraft II Discussion 18 11-28-2009 07:15 AM
StarCraft II Playable at GStar 2009, Mothership Wormhole Transit Gradius StarCraft II Discussion 7 11-13-2009 01:18 PM
More Gameplay Translations, IgroMir 2009 StarCraft II Coverage - Day 3 Gradius StarCraft II Discussion 24 11-12-2009 12:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.
vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Copyright © 1998 - 2010, StarCraft Legacy. All rights reserved.
SCLegacy is hosted by DarkStar Communications, home to high quality Ventrilo Servers.