

|
11-27-2009, 09:18 PM #2 | ![]() |
||||
|
Worst game so far. Z was really bad. He had all the map and he didn't build drones in all his expo but really he lost because he kept wasting his money away. I mean with all those bases go Ultralisk! stop making zerglings and mutalisks. His mutalisks harass didn't do crap.
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
![]() |
|
11-27-2009, 10:31 PM #3 | ![]() |
||||
|
Agh! The zerg guy actually had the game in the bag. The turning point was that bad assault on the planetary fortress. Also, he keeps building the banelings out in the open. That's real smart.
But seriously, something needs to be done about the Planetary Fortress. I like how it prevents the guy from getting a mineral overdrive, but that fortress is literally a fortress. It takes too long to destroy it, versus the Terran guy destroying the hatchery and then making it back to defend the expo. And then you have SCVs repairing it as well? |
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
![]() |
|
11-28-2009, 12:16 AM #4 | ![]() |
||||
|
I agree that the Zerg player should have won :[.
Before the Terran's 3rd Command Center was upgraded to a Planetary Fortress, he had to lift it off because it was going to be killed by Zerglings - I think that the Zerg player had an opportunity there to snipe it off with his Corruptors, but they were just chilling further off because he pulled them back :[. And yeah - the Zerg player looked like he was enjoying a much higher income than the Terran, what with his five bases (at one point, I think) vs two :[. Either his drone count wasn't that high, or he really did just throw away more money on Banelings than it may have seemed. I really don't think his Banelings were cost-effective :[. Then there was that time which a hunter-seeker missile (or two) blew up one of his huge Baneling clumps. It took out two Ravens as well, but I think it worked out better for the Terran player. |
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
![]() |
|
11-28-2009, 06:15 AM #7 | ![]() |
||||
|
@ GRUNT
Terran player lost about 4-5 Ravens with HSM don't know which part of video was that, third or second. And he had a lot of opportunities to win this game, but his Corruptor control was really bad :/ Pretty much same with Banelings, Mutas wasn't so bad after all And I am happy to see that you can still effectively harass with them. Also I think that he would do much better if he made Infestors with Fungal Growth to stop moving of those M&M so he could actually blow up them with Banelings. @ Grrblt Seem that you have to click on the opponents unit or something like that :/ Dunno why really or you have to stand, cause you can't transfor while moving.
Last edited by RamiZ; 11-28-2009 at 06:18 AM.
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
![]() |
|
11-28-2009, 08:24 AM #8 | ![]() |
||||
|
That missile on those Banelings that destroyed almost all of them seems pretty imbalanced. It was quite funny to see though
I bet the Zerg player shit backwards.
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
![]() |
|
11-28-2009, 11:45 AM #10 | ![]() |
||||
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GStar 2009 Videos | TychusFindlay | StarCraft II Discussion | 147 | 12-30-2009 07:32 PM |
| GStar 2009 StarCraft 2 Protoss vs. Terran Gameplay Video | Gradius | StarCraft II Discussion | 5 | 11-28-2009 04:24 PM |
| GStar 2009 StarCraft 2 Zerg vs. Terran Gameplay Video | Gradius | StarCraft II Discussion | 18 | 11-28-2009 07:15 AM |
| StarCraft II Playable at GStar 2009, Mothership Wormhole Transit | Gradius | StarCraft II Discussion | 7 | 11-13-2009 01:18 PM |
| More Gameplay Translations, IgroMir 2009 StarCraft II Coverage - Day 3 | Gradius | StarCraft II Discussion | 24 | 11-12-2009 12:32 PM |