Page 328 of 328 FirstFirst ... 228278318326327328
Results 3,271 to 3,275 of 3275

Thread: Macro Mechanics Discussion Thread

  1. #3271

    Default Re: Macro Mechanics Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Gradius View Post
    I am going to unstick this thread, as I believe discussion on this topic has finally died down.


    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooook.

  2. #3272

    Default Re: Macro Mechanics Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by ArcherofAiur View Post
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooook.
    This is all your fault.

    If only...

    ...if only... you had... responded.

    :'(
    http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/7699/commun1.png

  3. #3273

    Default Re: Macro Mechanics Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by pure.Wasted View Post
    This is all your fault.

    If only...

    ...if only... you had... responded.

    :'(


    One thousand wasnt enough?




    I think the consensus is that MULEs and Chronoboost are fine and while everyone knows Spawn Larva sucks just as much there is not a chance in hell Blizzard will change it now. Part of their new "When its ready, unless Bobby Kotick says otherwise" approach to game design.

  4. #3274
    TheEconomist's Avatar Lord of Economics
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,895

    Default Re: Macro Mechanics Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Gradius View Post
    ArcherofAiur - 1,045 Posts
    This is unfathomable.

    I'm curious: how do you think the macro mechanics turned out? If you feel that answering this would start a shitstorm then PLEASE ignore it



    Rest In Peace, Old Friend.

  5. #3275

    Default Re: Macro Mechanics Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TychusFindlay View Post
    I'm curious: how do you think the macro mechanics turned out?
    Good.


    I think the game is much better for it. However I think more work could have been done. Particularly on the Zerg mechanic.

Similar Threads

  1. New Article for the Macro Mechanics
    By RODTHEGOD in forum StarCraft II Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 10:43 PM
  2. What would YOUR macro be?
    By Xyvik in forum StarCraft II Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 09-24-2009, 09:02 PM
  3. Whose decision was it to have racially unique macro mechanics?
    By n00bonicPlague in forum StarCraft II Discussion
    Replies: 155
    Last Post: 09-23-2009, 06:36 AM
  4. Press Update Discussion Thread.
    By Pandonetho in forum StarCraft II Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-29-2009, 02:20 AM
  5. Making the Macro Mechanics Permanent?
    By ArcherofAiur in forum StarCraft II Discussion
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 05-23-2009, 09:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •